HOME | SITE MAP | SEARCH | CONTACT | CUG | OLAT | EXTRANET
EDUCATIONPHD PROGRAMFACULTY & RESEARCHSTUDENTS & ALUMNIKNOWLEDGE CENTERABOUT US
  
Research Centers
Faculty
Faculty Expertise Overview
Research Projects
Publications
Research Paper Series
SFInsight
SFI Connection
Occasional Paper Series
Academic Publications
Swiss Finance Institute Research Prizes
SFI Research Days
Country, Sector or Style: What Matters Most When Constructing Global Equity Portfolios? An Empirical Investigation from 1990-2001.

Authors
Foort HAMELINK - Lombard Odier & Cie and Vrije Universiteit
Hélène HARASTY - Lombard Odier & Cie
Pierre HILLION - Insead (Singapore) and Academic Advisor to Lombard Odier &Cie

Date
October 2001

Click here to download a .pdf of this paper (1'689 KB).

Abstract
Equity returns are believed to be strongly influenced by country, sector and style effects. A key issue is to be able to disentangle those various effects from one another. In particular, differences between country returns may simply reflect differences in the sector composition of country markets, which makes it clearly difficult to disassociate both effects. Similarly, from 1999-2001 the relative perfor-mance of Growth versus Value might be solely due to the striking performance of the Technology and Telecommunication sectors. For global equity portfolio man-agers, it is crucial to identify which factors offer the highest diversification benefits and return potential. We apply a multi-factor approach to estimate ”pure” coun-try, sector and style factor returns. Using data going back to 1990, we identify the major changes that have occurred in developed markets until 2001. Our various indicators clearly point out the growing influence of sector factors. However, coun-try effects remain important and there is no clear-cut evidence that sector factors dominate country factors. Style factors such as Growth, Value and Size also remain significant, even once sector and country effects are deduced. Finally, we show that momentum strategies based on sector returns offer substantial gains, while momen-tum strategies based on country returns do not. These findings suggest that, while diversification and return benefits from sector strategies have become substantial, managers should continue to monitor carefully country as well as style rewards and risks.

Event

26.11.2014
SFI Evening Seminar with Dr. Philipp Keller
Topic: The Regulatory Cold War: Financial Repression, Protectism and Possible Strategies for Switzerland
Place: Credit Suisse Forum, Rue de Lausanne 11-19, Geneva

03.12.2014
Lunch & Learn @ SFI
Informationsveranstaltung, Zurich

04. Dezember 2014
Evening Event with Dr. Andreas Dombret
Thema: Von der Währungsunion zur Bankenunion - Finanzintegration in Europa
Ort: Zürcher Kantonalbank, Josefstrasse 222, 8005 Zürich

More events


Press releases

08.05.2014
Swiss Finance Institute held, in partnership with McKinsey & Company and the Swiss Bankers Association, a half-day conference on: "Banking services for Swiss companies: needs, availability and trends".
English version / German version

09.04.2014
Swiss Finance Institute publishes its first White Paper, "The Extra Cost of Swiss Banking Regulation," by Professor Jean-Charles Rochet
English version / German version


17.03.2014
IAZI AG und Swiss Finance Institute lancieren CAS in Real Estate Finance

More press releases...


SFI in the news


Der Bund: Wolken sind schlecht für den Aktienkurs
Insights into research at the Institute for Financial Management (08.11.2014)

Ticino Management: Il Nobel parla, il gestore ascolta

Article about EFA convention (14.10.2014)

Le Temps: Retour de la Tension
Article on Systemic Risk Analysis in banking, by E.Jondeau and M.Rockinger (05.10.2014)

L'Hebdo: Philippe Bacchetta pour succéder à Jean Pierre Danthine à la BNS
Article about candidates for succession at BNS' Direction (10.09.2014)


© 2014 SwissFinanceInstitute | All rights reserved | Disclaimer